(haay..ma mimiss ko ang cofi at 3pm..ung pantry..tinda ni ate lilet..ung merienda n puro turon at palitaw. ung valero st. ung elevator sa chattam n pgkabgal. ung 7 eleven n lging wlang brya. ung games sa pc n ptago lng. ung officemates n nging close ko n
ung picturang bongang bongga, ung mga intriga sa office. haay anu p b?.. ill realy miss it..gnun tlga...theres always a goodbye..:()
Tuesday, January 06, 2009
Saturday, December 06, 2008
love....
LOVE ( First Part )
It hurts to love someone and not be loved in return, but what is more painful is to love someone and never find the courage to let that person know how you feel.
It hurts to love someone and not be loved in return, but what is more painful is to love someone and never find the courage to let that person know how you feel.
Thursday, May 01, 2008
ei guys!
am here agAIN,,medyo naging busy lang for the past months kaya di ako nakapag update ng postings...then...nawalan p ng connection sa office hehehe,,,busy rin ako ngaun sa review,,,sana i can make it na,,,,pls pray for me to pass,,,,tnx guys,,mwah!
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Doubtful attack...
(forwarded email fr. my yahoomail)
I started writing this piece Sunday evening, very doubtful that the Glorietta blast was caused by a terrorist’s bomb.
The purpose of a terrorist’s bomb is to cause as many casualties as possible. The logical place to plant the bomb is in the middle of a huge crowd – such as the one that killed 136 people during the motorcade for Benazir Bhutto in Karachi ( Pakistan ) just the day before.
Or the terrorist will plant the bomb in a high traffic area where many people walk around, such as in a public market or a bus station – such as has happened many times in Iraq and Afghanistan .
By all accounts, the explosion last Friday in Makati ’s Glorietta occurred in a basement service area where there are NO pedestrians or shoppers milling about, and where entry is actually restricted to authorized personnel only.
The high number of casualties - 11 dead and more than 100 wounded – can be explained by the fact that the explosion/s punched a 2-metter hole in the ceiling – the floor of the ground floor or atrium floor of Glorietta 2 – the force collapsing one of the escalators and blowing the plastic skylights, three floors up, away.
Most of the wounded must have been hit by flying objects –glass, metal, masonry, wood – scattered by the blast. Most of the fatalities and the seriously injured must have been near Ground Zero and were killed by the concussion or were hit by collapsing walls and other heavy objects.
The point is the casualty list would have been much longer if the supposed terrorist had packed his bomb with thousands of ball bearings and nails, as is usual SOP among terrorists, and detonated it in the center hall of Glorietta with thousands of shoppers milling about on a busy Friday afternoon.
Putting the “bomb” in an enclosed basement area, which is inaccessible to the general public, just does not make sense if the purpose is to cause maximum casualties. There are also no reports of any injuries due to ball bearings or nails, many of which would still be evident in or near the basement service area, if they were indeed used.
Investigators should go back to their original assessment, that this was probably caused by an LPG gas tank/s explosion. I do not understand why PNP director general Avelino Razon dropped the plausible LPG explanation and embraced the terrorist bomb story, based allegedly on traces of RDX in the debris, which eventually were found to be non-existent. I also do not understand why Ayala Land , landowner of the property, insisted it was a terrorist bomb that did it, even with the paucity of evidence for it.
I understand from someone who has done some work in the premises that this basement service area is where the cooking gas cylinders of several nearby restaurants – Luk Yuen, Kimpura, Peking Garden , etc - are stored, to which each kitchen is connected by individual copper tubing lines, which are metered for consumption..
Certainly these gas cylinders are not of the 11-kilo household size, but of the large 50-kilo restaurant size. And each restaurant must have three or four of these cylinders on hand at any one time. If this assumption is correct, there may have been at least nine to 12 heavy duty gas cylinders in that basement area that day.
But, of course, gas cylinders do not just explode for no reason. One of them may have been leaking. And in the enclosed space of the basement service area, a gas build-up can be lethal. A lighted match, a cigarette, a cigarette lighter, even the tiny spark in a cell phone can cause the gas-rich air to flame up and the leaking gas cylinder to explode, all in a fraction of a second.
There are also unverified reports that there was on-going construction work in that basement service area, involving acetylene gas equipment.
The force of this initial explosion would have dislodged other cylinders from their copper tubing connections, thus causing these decapitated cylinders to also leak and explode, all in a fraction of a second. It must have been this second, more massive explosion that punched a hole through the ceiling/floor and caused most of the casualties, especially since the expanding gas from these decapitated cylinders would explode upward .
This would be consistent with the testimony of one female survivor who was interviewed by TV anchor Chiqui Roa on ANC last Saturday. The survivor said she heard TWO explosions: one relatively light, followed by a massive one.
I am finishing this article Monday morning. I am surprised to read in the newspapers that investigators had blamed the explosion on a bomb even before they could gather any chemical evidence in the service area where the blast occurred, supposedly because that area was flooded. At least two days were wasted, during which chemical evidence in that service area could have been tampered with, erased, planted or removed. Accidentally or otherwise..
Investigators would have to swab the walls and fixtures in that area to determine the chemical composition of the explosive. If the blast was caused by TNT, dynamite or gun powder (or their derivatives), the walls and fixtures in that area would be coated with a film of nitrate residue. I do not know the active chemical in RDX or C-4, but they would also leave a distinctive chemical signature.
If the walls and fixtures in that area are coated with nothing more than carbon ash, then the source of the explosion was likely either LPG or – another proffered culprit – methane gas, supposedly from raw sewage. Was this room a septic tank, for chrissakes, right next to a restaurant?. Another proffered culprit – diesel fuel – is even less plausible. Diesel fuel does not gasify (or explode) at room temperature.
But why this insistent denial of even the possibility that it was LPG that did it? Does it have to do with insurance and liability claims?
Only after the walls of the blast zone have been swabbed, and swabs analyzed – which should have been done right after the explosion - can anyone say with any finality if the blast was an act of terrorism or was nothing but a tragic accident. *****
I started writing this piece Sunday evening, very doubtful that the Glorietta blast was caused by a terrorist’s bomb.
The purpose of a terrorist’s bomb is to cause as many casualties as possible. The logical place to plant the bomb is in the middle of a huge crowd – such as the one that killed 136 people during the motorcade for Benazir Bhutto in Karachi ( Pakistan ) just the day before.
Or the terrorist will plant the bomb in a high traffic area where many people walk around, such as in a public market or a bus station – such as has happened many times in Iraq and Afghanistan .
By all accounts, the explosion last Friday in Makati ’s Glorietta occurred in a basement service area where there are NO pedestrians or shoppers milling about, and where entry is actually restricted to authorized personnel only.
The high number of casualties - 11 dead and more than 100 wounded – can be explained by the fact that the explosion/s punched a 2-metter hole in the ceiling – the floor of the ground floor or atrium floor of Glorietta 2 – the force collapsing one of the escalators and blowing the plastic skylights, three floors up, away.
Most of the wounded must have been hit by flying objects –glass, metal, masonry, wood – scattered by the blast. Most of the fatalities and the seriously injured must have been near Ground Zero and were killed by the concussion or were hit by collapsing walls and other heavy objects.
The point is the casualty list would have been much longer if the supposed terrorist had packed his bomb with thousands of ball bearings and nails, as is usual SOP among terrorists, and detonated it in the center hall of Glorietta with thousands of shoppers milling about on a busy Friday afternoon.
Putting the “bomb” in an enclosed basement area, which is inaccessible to the general public, just does not make sense if the purpose is to cause maximum casualties. There are also no reports of any injuries due to ball bearings or nails, many of which would still be evident in or near the basement service area, if they were indeed used.
Investigators should go back to their original assessment, that this was probably caused by an LPG gas tank/s explosion. I do not understand why PNP director general Avelino Razon dropped the plausible LPG explanation and embraced the terrorist bomb story, based allegedly on traces of RDX in the debris, which eventually were found to be non-existent. I also do not understand why Ayala Land , landowner of the property, insisted it was a terrorist bomb that did it, even with the paucity of evidence for it.
I understand from someone who has done some work in the premises that this basement service area is where the cooking gas cylinders of several nearby restaurants – Luk Yuen, Kimpura, Peking Garden , etc - are stored, to which each kitchen is connected by individual copper tubing lines, which are metered for consumption..
Certainly these gas cylinders are not of the 11-kilo household size, but of the large 50-kilo restaurant size. And each restaurant must have three or four of these cylinders on hand at any one time. If this assumption is correct, there may have been at least nine to 12 heavy duty gas cylinders in that basement area that day.
But, of course, gas cylinders do not just explode for no reason. One of them may have been leaking. And in the enclosed space of the basement service area, a gas build-up can be lethal. A lighted match, a cigarette, a cigarette lighter, even the tiny spark in a cell phone can cause the gas-rich air to flame up and the leaking gas cylinder to explode, all in a fraction of a second.
There are also unverified reports that there was on-going construction work in that basement service area, involving acetylene gas equipment.
The force of this initial explosion would have dislodged other cylinders from their copper tubing connections, thus causing these decapitated cylinders to also leak and explode, all in a fraction of a second. It must have been this second, more massive explosion that punched a hole through the ceiling/floor and caused most of the casualties, especially since the expanding gas from these decapitated cylinders would explode upward .
This would be consistent with the testimony of one female survivor who was interviewed by TV anchor Chiqui Roa on ANC last Saturday. The survivor said she heard TWO explosions: one relatively light, followed by a massive one.
I am finishing this article Monday morning. I am surprised to read in the newspapers that investigators had blamed the explosion on a bomb even before they could gather any chemical evidence in the service area where the blast occurred, supposedly because that area was flooded. At least two days were wasted, during which chemical evidence in that service area could have been tampered with, erased, planted or removed. Accidentally or otherwise..
Investigators would have to swab the walls and fixtures in that area to determine the chemical composition of the explosive. If the blast was caused by TNT, dynamite or gun powder (or their derivatives), the walls and fixtures in that area would be coated with a film of nitrate residue. I do not know the active chemical in RDX or C-4, but they would also leave a distinctive chemical signature.
If the walls and fixtures in that area are coated with nothing more than carbon ash, then the source of the explosion was likely either LPG or – another proffered culprit – methane gas, supposedly from raw sewage. Was this room a septic tank, for chrissakes, right next to a restaurant?. Another proffered culprit – diesel fuel – is even less plausible. Diesel fuel does not gasify (or explode) at room temperature.
But why this insistent denial of even the possibility that it was LPG that did it? Does it have to do with insurance and liability claims?
Only after the walls of the blast zone have been swabbed, and swabs analyzed – which should have been done right after the explosion - can anyone say with any finality if the blast was an act of terrorism or was nothing but a tragic accident. *****
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
sa gitna ng kaguluhan
Hanggang ngayon ay hindi pa rin malaman kung anu ba talaga ang sanhi ng pagsabog sa G2 makati, mahirap ba talagang hanapan ng solusyon ang ganung pangyayari?...minsan inisip ko, na kung manghingi na lang kaya ng tulong mula sa amerika o ibang bansa na mayroong higit na kaalaman at gamit sa pagtukoy sa dahilan ng pagsabog,,,mahirap ba talagang tukuyin dahil sa wala man lang makitang ebidensya na nagpapatunay na bomba nga ang sumabog?....or mahirap talagang mahanap ang solusyon sapagkat marami ang nagpapagulo sa sitwasyon,,,maraming nakikialam,, maraming kumukuha ng pagkakataon para sa pansariling intensyon, maraming umiiwas sa sisi ng taong bayan kung bakit ito nangyari,,,o talagang nalilito lang tayo sa kabila ng ibat ibang bersyon ng balita?,,,kahit ito pa ay isang aksidente lamang o plano ng isang terorista....may mga bagay na maaari natin gawin sa ngayon,,,ito ay ang pagiingat natin, pananalangin at paggawa ng kabutihan sa ating kapwa,,,,
Monday, October 22, 2007
tatlong araw makalipas...
isang ma-araw na lunes ang sumalubong sa mga naglalakad at pumapasok sa opisina dito sa ayala. Tatlong araw na rin ang lumilipas pagkatapos ng grabeng pagsabog sa Glorieta 2. Parang wala ngang nangyari, tuloy pa rin ang takbo ng sirkulasyon dito sa syudad, mangilan-ngilan na lang ang nag-uusap tungkol sa nangyaring pagsabog...pero kahit ganun pa rin, iiwasan ko munang pumunta sa glorieta, mainam na ang nag iingat,,,takot pa kasi ako,,,mabaho pa daw ang ilang bahagi ng mall,,amoy lupa,,,amoy luma...doon pa naman ako madalas dumaan kapag galing sa mall at papuntang sakayan ng jeep,,,,3 days na ang nakalilipas,,,malamang,,may mumu na dun hekhek,,,,
Sana naman ay magkaron ng kaunting konsensya kung sino man ang taong nasa likod ng pagsabog,,,madaming buhay ang nawala,,,madaming pamilya ang nangulila,,, +
Sana naman ay magkaron ng kaunting konsensya kung sino man ang taong nasa likod ng pagsabog,,,madaming buhay ang nawala,,,madaming pamilya ang nangulila,,, +
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
1 year na pala!
Ei friends!, here i am again,,back in a way that ive been used to,,,,medyo di na kasi busy sa work kaya eto may time na uli mag post dito sa blog ko,,,haaay,,,ang dami ko na miss dito sa blogging world,,,naalala ko tuloy when i did starting making this blog site,,t'was october last year.,,,,,,,,, ,,oh,,,tingnan mo nga naman, haha! at this point in time ko lang naalala na one year na pala ang blog site na'to lolz,,,tnx for this wonderful thoughts,,,,,even i have changed my blog title and web address,,,the content and the concept are still remain on this,,of course,,,im proud pa rin for the award that i have received,,its week 41 filipino blog of the week promoted by no other mr.talksmart. heheheh...tnx then...
Many days and months na nga are passed,,,medyo naging busy kasi sa work at nawalan ng opportunity for giving attention for my blog,,kaya naging matamlay ang page and then di na nasundan ang posting....
My only wish for my blog for its 1st anniv naks!,,(showbiz ah)....hope na i have more enough time to create an informative post and inspiring thoughts na ma ooffer ko sa mga blogssters and readers of this blog,,,,
To all my co blogsters and readers,,,tnx for sharing ur time and inspiring moments of thoughts that became my insipiration of this created simple, free, and very personal blog,,,,hope to see you around,,,,,muah!
Monday, July 16, 2007
Listen-Sarah Geronimo in motion
comments from youtube.com
cruhser:haaay sarah bukod kang pinagpla
grabeh tumataas balahibo ko galing!
)purpleclefai
wow! ang galing galing tlga! tnx 4 this!
issah09pink
alam nio, pagkatungtong ko sa araneta, nafeel ko na, na kakantahin niya tong listen.
johnray8ebora
galing nia.. mas maganda to kesa kina kyla at nina..at kung sino mang pinoy na kumanta nito..bumagay kasi sa boses nia tong kanta..haha..
johnray8ebora
Waaah! sbi ko na at kakantahin nia 'to..matagal ko nang inaabangan sa asap na kantahin nia to..un pla sa concert hahah,..,galing talaga..sayang di me nakapanood..! sana lumabas agad ang dvd nito..khit pirated..basta mapanood lang.. hihih
islandICE
galing talaga nito!
congrats sarah!
Monday, June 18, 2007
Sunday, June 03, 2007
Interesting conversation
INTERESTING CONVERSATION
An atheist professor of philosophy speaks to his class
on the problem science has with God, the Almighty. He
asks one of his new Christian students to stand
and.....
Professor: You are a Christian, aren't you, son?
Student : Yes, sir.
Prof: So you believe in God?
Student : Absolutely, sir.
Prof: Is God good?
Student : Sure.
Prof: Is God all-powerful?
Student : Yes.
Prof: My brother died of cancer even though he
prayed to God to heal him. Most of us would attempt to
help others who are ill. But God didn't. How is this
God good then? Hmm?
(Student is silent.)
Prof: You can't answer, can you? Let's start again,
young fella. Is God good?
Student :Yes.
Prof: Is Satan good?
Student : No.
Prof: Where does Satan come from?
Student : From...God...
Prof: That's right. Tell me son, is there evil in
this world?
Student : Yes.
Prof: Evil is everywhere, isn't it? And God did make
everything. Correct?
Student : Yes.
Prof: So who created evil?
(Student does not answer.)
Prof: Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred?
Ugliness? All these terrible things exist in the
world, don't they?
Student :Yes, sir.
Prof: So, who created them?
(Student has no answer.)
Prof: Science says you have 5 senses you use to
identify and observe the world around you. Tell me,
son...Have you ever seen God?
Student: No, sir.
Prof: Tell us if you have ever heard your God?
Student : No , sir.
Prof: Have you ever felt your God, tasted your God,
smelt your God? Have you ever had any sensory
perception of God for that matter?
Student : No, sir. I'm afraid I haven't.
Prof: Yet you still believe in Him?
Student : Yes.
Prof: According to empirical, testable, demonstrable
protocol, science says your GOD doesn't exist. What do
you say to that, son?
Student : Nothing. I only have my faith.
Prof: Yes. Faith. And that is the problem science
has.
Student : Professor, is there such a thing as heat?
Prof: Yes.
Student : And is there such a thing as cold?
Prof: Yes.
Student : No sir. There isn't.
The lecture theatre becomes very quiet with this turn
of events.)
Student : Sir, you can have lots of heat, even more
heat, superheat, mega heat, white heat, a little heat
or no heat. But we don't have anything called cold. We
can hit 458 degrees below zero which is no heat, but
we can't go any further after that. There is no such
thing as cold. Cold is only a word we use to describe
the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat is
energy. Cold is not the
opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it.
(There is pin-drop silence in the lecture theatre.)
Student : What about darkness, Professor? Is there
such a thing as darkness?
Prof: Yes. What is night if there isn't darkness?
Student : You're wrong again, sir. Darkness is the
absence of something. You can have low light, normal
light, bright light, flashing light....But if you have
no light
constantly, you have nothing and it's called
darkness, isn't it? In reality,
darkness isn't. If it were you would be able to make
darkness darker, wouldn't you?
Prof: So what is the point you are making, young man?
Student : Sir, my point is your philosophical premise
is flawed.
Prof: Flawed? Can you explain how?
Student : Sir, you are working on the premise of
duality. You argue there is life and then there is
death, a good God and a bad God. You are viewing the
concept of God as something finite, something we can
measure.
Sir, science can't even explain a thought. It uses
electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much
less fully understood either one. To view death as the
opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that
death cannot exist as a substantive thing. Death is
not the opposite of life: just the absence of it.
Now tell me, Professor. Do you teach your students
that they evolved from a monkey?
Prof: If you are referring to the natural
evolutionary process, yes, of course, I do.
Student : Have you ever observed evolution with your
own eyes, sir?
(The Professor shakes his head with a smile,
beginning to realize where the argument is going.)
Student : Since no one has ever observed the process
of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this
process is an on-going endeavour, are you not teaching
your opinion, sir? Are you not a scientist but a
preacher?
(The class is in uproar.)
Student : Is there anyone in the class who has ever
seen the Professor's brain?
(The class breaks out into laughter.)
Student : Is there anyone here who has ever heard the
Professor's brain, felt it, touched or smelt
it?.....No one appears to have done so. So, according
to the established rules of empirical, stable,
demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no
brain, sir. With all due respect, sir, how do we then
trust your
lectures, sir?
(The room is silent. The professor stares at the
student, his face unfathomable.)
Prof: I guess you'll have to take them on faith, son.
Student : That is it sir.. The link between man & god
is FAITH. That is all that keeps things moving &
alive.
An atheist professor of philosophy speaks to his class
on the problem science has with God, the Almighty. He
asks one of his new Christian students to stand
and.....
Professor: You are a Christian, aren't you, son?
Student : Yes, sir.
Prof: So you believe in God?
Student : Absolutely, sir.
Prof: Is God good?
Student : Sure.
Prof: Is God all-powerful?
Student : Yes.
Prof: My brother died of cancer even though he
prayed to God to heal him. Most of us would attempt to
help others who are ill. But God didn't. How is this
God good then? Hmm?
(Student is silent.)
Prof: You can't answer, can you? Let's start again,
young fella. Is God good?
Student :Yes.
Prof: Is Satan good?
Student : No.
Prof: Where does Satan come from?
Student : From...God...
Prof: That's right. Tell me son, is there evil in
this world?
Student : Yes.
Prof: Evil is everywhere, isn't it? And God did make
everything. Correct?
Student : Yes.
Prof: So who created evil?
(Student does not answer.)
Prof: Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred?
Ugliness? All these terrible things exist in the
world, don't they?
Student :Yes, sir.
Prof: So, who created them?
(Student has no answer.)
Prof: Science says you have 5 senses you use to
identify and observe the world around you. Tell me,
son...Have you ever seen God?
Student: No, sir.
Prof: Tell us if you have ever heard your God?
Student : No , sir.
Prof: Have you ever felt your God, tasted your God,
smelt your God? Have you ever had any sensory
perception of God for that matter?
Student : No, sir. I'm afraid I haven't.
Prof: Yet you still believe in Him?
Student : Yes.
Prof: According to empirical, testable, demonstrable
protocol, science says your GOD doesn't exist. What do
you say to that, son?
Student : Nothing. I only have my faith.
Prof: Yes. Faith. And that is the problem science
has.
Student : Professor, is there such a thing as heat?
Prof: Yes.
Student : And is there such a thing as cold?
Prof: Yes.
Student : No sir. There isn't.
The lecture theatre becomes very quiet with this turn
of events.)
Student : Sir, you can have lots of heat, even more
heat, superheat, mega heat, white heat, a little heat
or no heat. But we don't have anything called cold. We
can hit 458 degrees below zero which is no heat, but
we can't go any further after that. There is no such
thing as cold. Cold is only a word we use to describe
the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat is
energy. Cold is not the
opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it.
(There is pin-drop silence in the lecture theatre.)
Student : What about darkness, Professor? Is there
such a thing as darkness?
Prof: Yes. What is night if there isn't darkness?
Student : You're wrong again, sir. Darkness is the
absence of something. You can have low light, normal
light, bright light, flashing light....But if you have
no light
constantly, you have nothing and it's called
darkness, isn't it? In reality,
darkness isn't. If it were you would be able to make
darkness darker, wouldn't you?
Prof: So what is the point you are making, young man?
Student : Sir, my point is your philosophical premise
is flawed.
Prof: Flawed? Can you explain how?
Student : Sir, you are working on the premise of
duality. You argue there is life and then there is
death, a good God and a bad God. You are viewing the
concept of God as something finite, something we can
measure.
Sir, science can't even explain a thought. It uses
electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much
less fully understood either one. To view death as the
opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that
death cannot exist as a substantive thing. Death is
not the opposite of life: just the absence of it.
Now tell me, Professor. Do you teach your students
that they evolved from a monkey?
Prof: If you are referring to the natural
evolutionary process, yes, of course, I do.
Student : Have you ever observed evolution with your
own eyes, sir?
(The Professor shakes his head with a smile,
beginning to realize where the argument is going.)
Student : Since no one has ever observed the process
of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this
process is an on-going endeavour, are you not teaching
your opinion, sir? Are you not a scientist but a
preacher?
(The class is in uproar.)
Student : Is there anyone in the class who has ever
seen the Professor's brain?
(The class breaks out into laughter.)
Student : Is there anyone here who has ever heard the
Professor's brain, felt it, touched or smelt
it?.....No one appears to have done so. So, according
to the established rules of empirical, stable,
demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no
brain, sir. With all due respect, sir, how do we then
trust your
lectures, sir?
(The room is silent. The professor stares at the
student, his face unfathomable.)
Prof: I guess you'll have to take them on faith, son.
Student : That is it sir.. The link between man & god
is FAITH. That is all that keeps things moving &
alive.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)